Why is sports technology a threat to keeping the game fair, safe and affordable


Why is sports technology a threat to keeping the game fair, safe and affordable

The history of sports technology is a long and dirty affair. It’s exciting, heartbroken, whether it’s a call for success or fraud.

The humble golf ball is a good example. The basic principle of golf is to go from “a” to “b” and end up with as few baskets as possible. But applying a pit pattern on its surface can further work. Then optimize the pattern of indentation, and the ball will hook or slice less. Suddenly, the skills needed to play the game became easier.

Allowing any of these evolutionary steps will inevitably lead to debates about the importance and limitations of technological progress.

Keep the dispute

History is full of controversial movement techniques.

The golf ball is an innovation that makes it too easy to work effectively and efficiently. This innovation benefits low-tech players who tend to be more prone to mistakes, rather than high-skilled players who are already good at driving accurately. It basically handles the game – it’s banned.

At the 2000 Sydney Olympics, full-body swimsuits caught the public’s imagination. With the development of the design, the appearance of the suit shows that it can greatly improve the performance of swimmers. Among the 40 events after a total of 43 records being broken world swimming championships in 2009 and 2009 world record was broken in less than a year’s time, the world swimming management organization voted to ban span suit.

The tragedy is not that the suit is banned, but that the world record remains the same. This means that future athletes don’t have the same advantages as those athletes. The decision may be unfair.

The same is true of South African sprinter Oscar Pistorius. In 2008, he tried to compete at the Olympics and paralympics. His use of prosthetic limbs and carbon-fibre blades sparked a heated debate about what advantages they gave him.

After a long period of controversy involving research and anti-research, Pistorius was allowed to participate – mainly due to a lack of consensus on the issue.

Faster and higher

The Olympic motto is “Citius, Altius, Fortius” (faster, higher, stronger). This shows that we should accept any progress and push all of our resources to achieve it.

Nothing is more obvious than riding a bicycle. Forty years ago, riders wore cardigans and used the same bikes for various activities. Now, they wear advanced fabrics to maximize aerodynamic performance and optimize core body temperature while using different topography or hard bikes. One might argue that the technology has made athletes’ efforts unmatchable today.

The cycling time record involves riders cycling at the velodrome as much as possible within 60 minutes. In the 1990s, innovation and bicycles showed a series of designs that had barely changed since the 19th century.

The international cycling authorities fear that these things are out of control, and that engineers may be able to verbally explain the results. It then rewrites the rules so that the rider can use a similar design to 50 years ago. It’s a noble idea, but cyclists continue to try to find holes.

At the end of 2014, the governing body re-modified the rules to allow contemporary time trial cycling design. In fact, giving a sport some technical wiggle room will allow sponsors to come and provide fans with interest and prevent movement from stalling.

Keep the access

The equipment required for physical activity can determine its success and participation level. New and interesting technologies may allow us to engage in a sport. But costs and access are monitored to keep accessibility.

Part of the controversy over swimsuits is that only athletes with the right sponsors can enter. Many people can’t effectively use it as a knife to shoot a gun.

Sports equipment and technology are too expensive and future athletes will be involved. Keeping equipment difficult to use will have to be done by amateurs.

For example, standing paddles are known as the world’s fastest growing water sports. But there is no sound management or equipment specification to guide what length or width plate. The breadth of the board determines how stable the board will be in rowing, and therefore how to make a difference in one’s ability to balance. The narrower the circuit board, the faster it can be used, but it will be more challenging to use. Further, the original performance will be affected, but more people will be able to participate in the sport.

Safety problem

What about the impact of technological advances on security? For example, the center of gravity of the javelin has changed in the late 1980s to ensure that the javelin remains in the existing pitch at a time when the athletes are getting farther and farther away. Similarly, amateur boxing helmets are eventually adopted to provide extra protection for athletes.

But unintended consequences must also be taken into account. Although the helmet has reduced the overall severity of head injuries, it can also give the boxers a sense of invulnerability. This may explain why the headgear has not been introduced for the number of people who have been recording head injuries.

In the end, there is a philosophical difference between the technology that promotes sports and the improvement of sports technology. Empirical science is often accompanied by philosophical debate. For amputees, this is not just a sign of prosthetic limbs. It also challenges people’s perceptions of disability and how humans should engage with technology.

Technology can promote physical activity and challenge the limits of our performance. But we must be careful to ensure that the movement is fair, safe and smooth.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here